Power Broker Mentor Project
Psychology *
Philosophy
Physics
Politics
[original 7-24-14]
* 7-28-14 Technical glitches lost the first run at this. Here is the 2nd still under construction.
By intention there are two runs at Physics. Di-Spencering with 4mat dot dot dot?
Rough Clearing House of Disciplines?
Philosophy: Giroux
Physics: Gravity
Politics: OW
Go to *
[Pardon my spaciousness- Apparent Browser Anomaly]
7-30-14 More Triadic Referrals.
Showing posts with label PBMP. Show all posts
Showing posts with label PBMP. Show all posts
Thursday, July 24, 2014
Monday, July 14, 2014
Thursday, June 19, 2014
Tuesday, June 17, 2014
Friday, April 05, 2013
Thursday, December 20, 2012
by Stiob?!?
D-google:
I reference this indirectly** in terms of how* I get here***.
*Ctrl F "ananchronist"
** ouch (practical stiob?)
*** "stiob"
(The "stiob" of practical*the link* is more a tan/gent shall.)
[Not to pun on more asterisks, but the dimentionalism might be.^]
^ [or (fn) IS! ]
[ submitted for yo/re consideration ? / ! ... ]
[12-21-12: Project Salon Pause^^ ... Not !]
Also note that (fn) *link* was inserted on this date.
^^ (Ce ne pas, pax) Politics is something/everything paradox.(ouch)
(the last *^^* was paradox placement)
[Speaking of trilogies, trolls and toll-keens, my stumble upon "stiob" was via Starship Troopers 2: Hero of the Federation (Or American Exceptionalism: Too Point Oh!)]
[A fellow tangent?(rise over run)]
[ SO ? ]
I reference this indirectly** in terms of how* I get here***.
*Ctrl F "ananchronist"
** ouch (practical stiob?)
*** "stiob"
(The "stiob" of practical*the link* is more a tan/gent shall.)
[Not to pun on more asterisks, but the dimentionalism might be.^]
^ [or (fn) IS! ]
[ submitted for yo/re consideration ? / ! ... ]
[12-21-12: Project Salon Pause^^ ... Not !]
Also note that (fn) *link* was inserted on this date.
^^ (Ce ne pas, pax) Politics is something/everything paradox.(ouch)
(the last *^^* was paradox placement)
[Speaking of trilogies, trolls and toll-keens, my stumble upon "stiob" was via Starship Troopers 2: Hero of the Federation (Or American Exceptionalism: Too Point Oh!)]
[A fellow tangent?(rise over run)]
[ SO ? ]
Monday, July 16, 2012
EMP
Experience Message Project
Not Experience Mitt Project
In Seattle there is Paul Allen's Experience Music Project but last night (or as I hit snooze this AM) while it has escaped me now, my project was more "fair and balanced". Something about red, blue and purple, not to joke* about dreams. Experienced Medium Project was not what I was going for, but may be the way I roll.**
*Ctrl F "green"
** Roman Numberal Pages (label added).
[Scroll over for hints, Nav &*** need updates.]
[ Re: Cycle ? The Cycle (undated?)]
7-17-12 Perspectiv-ism (Not fully read yet.)
Dog Whistles ! Not (Nerdlandy Exceptionalism) So Cheap Trick [!] ? [!] (Or the Blue Badge of Courage.)[Raw Money and Pawlenty?]
[ The Real(B) Smoking Gun(A) ? CNBC guest and host, don't get America, Obama or English. "That" is not "it"! Obama did not say that they did not build thier businesses, they did not build the roads. Well, they did but, we paid for them. And today Romney showed that 75%(or plays down 94%) of the Chamber of Commerce don't get economics either.]
[A. Maria Bartiromo and her guest cannot be so obtuse or are they deliberately distorting what the President said. "That" is not "it", means that the President meant they did not build the infrastructure not their businesses. B. And former Senator Sununu is really blowing smoke, the better his message not be seen for how wrong it is.]
Not Experience Mitt Project
In Seattle there is Paul Allen's Experience Music Project but last night (or as I hit snooze this AM) while it has escaped me now, my project was more "fair and balanced". Something about red, blue and purple, not to joke* about dreams. Experienced Medium Project was not what I was going for, but may be the way I roll.**
*Ctrl F "green"
** Roman Numberal Pages (label added).
[Scroll over for hints, Nav &*** need updates.]
[ Re: Cycle ? The Cycle (undated?)]
7-17-12 Perspectiv-ism (Not fully read yet.)
Dog Whistles ! Not (Nerdlandy Exceptionalism) So Cheap Trick [!] ? [!] (Or the Blue Badge of Courage.)[Raw Money and Pawlenty?]
[ The Real(B) Smoking Gun(A) ? CNBC guest and host, don't get America, Obama or English. "That" is not "it"! Obama did not say that they did not build thier businesses, they did not build the roads. Well, they did but, we paid for them. And today Romney showed that 75%(or plays down 94%) of the Chamber of Commerce don't get economics either.]
[A. Maria Bartiromo and her guest cannot be so obtuse or are they deliberately distorting what the President said. "That" is not "it", means that the President meant they did not build the infrastructure not their businesses. B. And former Senator Sununu is really blowing smoke, the better his message not be seen for how wrong it is.]
Wednesday, July 11, 2012
The %th EleFont
Not to jump in the Lakoff, but my original heading was The %th Element*. Which was a type-oh or capital gain on taking the 5th. Well, not that far.(But maybe we will see.) The 5th Element was meant as reference to Roman numeral "v" for the sake of my table ofor con tents. But it is still to be determined what page this is.
So with this lede or misspell, it may be prophetic GeOhMeTry. i.e. Seg Way to my original intents.
(Speaking of See Sea D? An Ed segue Center on Communicable Downers re:caller who thought the court is a dictionary.)
Speaking of Attacks Dogs and hold-ups...or holders?
[This was a heckuva sojourn.]
The original trigger:
Stephanie Miller ;-) Referencing Sarah Palin on the need to decimate the filter. How who "chose their one" and "ushered him" into office. Palin loses the God Particle.
Translation from the wings: Sarah Palin wants to kill the medium.
pc? speaking of wave NOT! Zed?
[but who knows]
* All of the above was here** before I finished there. And well B4 Martin Bashir similarly rants. Speaking of house of cards or Dawn Key Lake Offs! Not to mention Vast Wind Mills.
** except first three(4) links (re:there)
So with this lede or misspell, it may be prophetic GeOhMeTry. i.e. Seg Way to my original intents.
(Speaking of See Sea D? An Ed segue Center on Communicable Downers re:caller who thought the court is a dictionary.)
Speaking of Attacks Dogs and hold-ups...or holders?
[This was a heckuva sojourn.]
The original trigger:
Stephanie Miller ;-) Referencing Sarah Palin on the need to decimate the filter. How who "chose their one" and "ushered him" into office. Palin loses the God Particle.
Translation from the wings: Sarah Palin wants to kill the medium.
pc? speaking of wave NOT! Zed?
[but who knows]
* All of the above was here** before I finished there. And well B4 Martin Bashir similarly rants. Speaking of house of cards or Dawn Key Lake Offs! Not to mention Vast Wind Mills.
** except first three(4) links (re:there)
Wednesday, May 02, 2012
CAD (2 out of 3 be bad)
May Day ain't what it used to be.
Cads are what they will be.
CAD used to stand for Computer Aided Design.
Fore! To correct the swing of sorts.
I recently referred to Ted Nugent as having CAD, Cause Affect Deficiency or Disorder, along with Mitt Romney. And since it is all about the defining issues of our time, or the 2012 election, the ideal flip-flop from Cause Affect Disorder is Culturally Aided Design. If fact I feel that the Jonathan Haidt book, The Righteous Mind may be enlightening to read, but I believe it has some imbalances.
Why does he pick the categories he does to distinguish liberals from conservatives? Why is having them balanced better than in some hierarchy? Why should we look to the sacred, and wouldn't the rest follow of sorts? SEGUE
If moral psychology is the foundation for politics and religion, what is the foundation of economics? Or physics and philosophy?
Now I know I am avoiding comment on the May Day issues**, but in the greater scheme of things, there may be a related point to do so. While I have yet to get the book, I have perused more than once most of the links in the previous paragraph(pre-segue). Not that they may be inserted only slightly more than haphazardly. In my lede, I have hinted that to be a CAD is not always bad, but sometimes it is just*** a tool*.
*BTW: it was more than just for convenience that I used affect over effect.
** 5-2-12
***5-3-12 "CAD" and "just" links are not endorsements of confrontation without consequences. Violence and destruction must not be condoned. Anarchists should be seen as part of the 1%. (Hijacking the message, much as the Tea-party had their's hijacked by the Koch bothers.) I might add that globalization, capitalism and even cap and trade, are not the problems or solutions^. It is the entitlements of the 1% in their hyperbola of fantasy. The only difference between anarchists and libertarians is the fantasy. Not that anarchists are more real, at least they realize that their is something about the foundations over the fountainhead.
[5-4-12 On the globalization front.]
Cads are what they will be.
CAD used to stand for Computer Aided Design.
Fore! To correct the swing of sorts.
I recently referred to Ted Nugent as having CAD, Cause Affect Deficiency or Disorder, along with Mitt Romney. And since it is all about the defining issues of our time, or the 2012 election, the ideal flip-flop from Cause Affect Disorder is Culturally Aided Design. If fact I feel that the Jonathan Haidt book, The Righteous Mind may be enlightening to read, but I believe it has some imbalances.
Why does he pick the categories he does to distinguish liberals from conservatives? Why is having them balanced better than in some hierarchy? Why should we look to the sacred, and wouldn't the rest follow of sorts? SEGUE
If moral psychology is the foundation for politics and religion, what is the foundation of economics? Or physics and philosophy?
Now I know I am avoiding comment on the May Day issues**, but in the greater scheme of things, there may be a related point to do so. While I have yet to get the book, I have perused more than once most of the links in the previous paragraph(pre-segue). Not that they may be inserted only slightly more than haphazardly. In my lede, I have hinted that to be a CAD is not always bad, but sometimes it is just*** a tool*.
*BTW: it was more than just for convenience that I used affect over effect.
** 5-2-12
***5-3-12 "CAD" and "just" links are not endorsements of confrontation without consequences. Violence and destruction must not be condoned. Anarchists should be seen as part of the 1%. (Hijacking the message, much as the Tea-party had their's hijacked by the Koch bothers.) I might add that globalization, capitalism and even cap and trade, are not the problems or solutions^. It is the entitlements of the 1% in their hyperbola of fantasy. The only difference between anarchists and libertarians is the fantasy. Not that anarchists are more real, at least they realize that their is something about the foundations over the fountainhead.
[5-4-12 On the globalization front.]
Tuesday, January 10, 2012
Primary Boogeyman
Rule to the Exception.
Freedom / Hardball
Mitt Romney wins, Paul 2nd, Huntsman 3rd.
Gingrich and South Carolina next.
Huntsman ticket to ride or flavor of moment?
Yeah that's the ticket, but here is even more.
There is the old adage "divide and conquer",
but then there is the exception that proves the rule.
If Republican political calculus is anything, it is attack strength.
Economic Freedom is the key.
What it means, is the meme.
Absolutism may be the red flag of the Teddy Bull,
but the cape* of the progressive.
*Ctrl F "Nietzsche"
[Romney indeed made history as the first non-incumbent Republican to win both Iowa and New Hampshire, but given recent history, Fukuyama and the Neo-cons, it seems to fit the Primary Boogeyman frame, not to mention unprecedented Bush the Uniter.]
[1-11-12 CBS Christie Does Cynical Well, "Jersey-Style" **
CBS Poll Romney beats Obama,
Michelle Beats Anger.]
[My original intent here yesterday, was a Primary Colors reference, and a pun on Exception to Rule, not The Rule, but don't step on my blue suede shoes. (Reference post-**)]
[** I mean the Governor of New Jersey does "lame" well, if as Romney's "hit man" he is accusing Obama of not doing anger well. Is that Neo-Boogeyman? A flip-flop of the Doom and Gloom, and more of the Fear and Smear. Governor Christie is the Sarah Palin with Lip Schtick. Ouch, that was not to imply that he is a VP choice, but given the frame maybe. When I use Hyperlink, I use Hyperlink. ]
[4a continued: Freedom is not a tool***, but an end that doesn't justify economics. This is my riff off of only the 1st paragraph of The Economist, on Economic blogs and "A less dismal debate." After reading it more fully(see ***) a funny thing happened on the way to the for 'em. Actually it only hinges on the "tool" concept and the nature of "innovation" and the nature of economic debates. Not that I have more than glanced at the debate example, but it also hinges on the nature of people as well as material or ideological forms.]
*** again note anacronism of 4m (see asterisks and bracketeds) as I evolved the post comma segment.[being in magazine 4m another one of the 4a.] (Note technical difficulties, uncertain if any threads or hyperlinks are lost, but I close in the middle of reading Marginal Revolutionaries in hard copy.)]
< previous post >
Freedom / Hardball
Mitt Romney wins, Paul 2nd, Huntsman 3rd.
Gingrich and South Carolina next.
Huntsman ticket to ride or flavor of moment?
Yeah that's the ticket, but here is even more.
There is the old adage "divide and conquer",
but then there is the exception that proves the rule.
If Republican political calculus is anything, it is attack strength.
Economic Freedom is the key.
What it means, is the meme.
Absolutism may be the red flag of the Teddy Bull,
but the cape* of the progressive.
*Ctrl F "Nietzsche"
[Romney indeed made history as the first non-incumbent Republican to win both Iowa and New Hampshire, but given recent history, Fukuyama and the Neo-cons, it seems to fit the Primary Boogeyman frame, not to mention unprecedented Bush the Uniter.]
[1-11-12 CBS Christie Does Cynical Well, "Jersey-Style" **
CBS Poll Romney beats Obama,
Michelle Beats Anger.]
[My original intent here yesterday, was a Primary Colors reference, and a pun on Exception to Rule, not The Rule, but don't step on my blue suede shoes. (Reference post-**)]
[** I mean the Governor of New Jersey does "lame" well, if as Romney's "hit man" he is accusing Obama of not doing anger well. Is that Neo-Boogeyman? A flip-flop of the Doom and Gloom, and more of the Fear and Smear. Governor Christie is the Sarah Palin with Lip Schtick. Ouch, that was not to imply that he is a VP choice, but given the frame maybe. When I use Hyperlink, I use Hyperlink. ]
[4a continued: Freedom is not a tool***, but an end that doesn't justify economics. This is my riff off of only the 1st paragraph of The Economist, on Economic blogs and "A less dismal debate." After reading it more fully(see ***) a funny thing happened on the way to the for 'em. Actually it only hinges on the "tool" concept and the nature of "innovation" and the nature of economic debates. Not that I have more than glanced at the debate example, but it also hinges on the nature of people as well as material or ideological forms.]
*** again note anacronism of 4m (see asterisks and bracketeds) as I evolved the post comma segment.[being in magazine 4m another one of the 4a.] (Note technical difficulties, uncertain if any threads or hyperlinks are lost, but I close in the middle of reading Marginal Revolutionaries in hard copy.)]
< previous post >
Friday, January 06, 2012
Neo-Perspectivism
It is hard to say which niche this arises from.**
Neo-Nuanced is one trigger.***
Even if retro actively.
No silver bullet.
(Or Lone Ranger)
(I, II, III, IV, Not nor note.)
(Far From It)
Less embedded:
It is not just to Pop Culture but social engineering.
If that is an aphorism, you have one hint.(ouch)
But Freud and Hitler were both Austrian,
but the latter-day Austrians are economic transcendentalists.*
(Emerson, Niche& Rand?)
Some credit may be due to "Plato Not Prozac."
[Just in.]
***
Notes to Asterisk Readers:
It may help the flow if one reads the asterisks in order and after a full read of this piece, but scrolling over links as one goes will be useful.
* no Emerson
** last link inserted: Maybe way too much of a D'Ribble or G'Ribble?
[Apologies for Neo-Euphemism.]
[Breaking News: Herman Cain will give an "unconventional Endorsement just prior to the South Carolina Primary. (Ctrl F "best" under vent) I hope it is not another one of his tours or projects, but if it is not a third party run or candidate it might be someone from out of the blue if not a write-in. Huntsman or Bachmann also come to mind.]
*** The irony of taxes, GDP and debt. Is it in the charts?
> Previous Post <
Neo-Nuanced is one trigger.***
Even if retro actively.
No silver bullet.
(Or Lone Ranger)
(I, II, III, IV, Not nor note.)
(Far From It)
Less embedded:
It is not just to Pop Culture but social engineering.
If that is an aphorism, you have one hint.(ouch)
But Freud and Hitler were both Austrian,
but the latter-day Austrians are economic transcendentalists.*
(Emerson, Niche& Rand?)
Some credit may be due to "Plato Not Prozac."
[Just in.]
***
Notes to Asterisk Readers:
It may help the flow if one reads the asterisks in order and after a full read of this piece, but scrolling over links as one goes will be useful.
* no Emerson
** last link inserted: Maybe way too much of a D'Ribble or G'Ribble?
[Apologies for Neo-Euphemism.]
[Breaking News: Herman Cain will give an "unconventional Endorsement just prior to the South Carolina Primary. (Ctrl F "best" under vent) I hope it is not another one of his tours or projects, but if it is not a third party run or candidate it might be someone from out of the blue if not a write-in. Huntsman or Bachmann also come to mind.]
*** The irony of taxes, GDP and debt. Is it in the charts?
> Previous Post <
Monday, December 12, 2011
Flow of Conscience
Not Exactly Either,
nor Out of the Box.
Speaking of Supply and Demand
or trickle down and bubble up.
No Dead C Scroll over, nor out.
Just a hint that things are not black and white,
nor up without down, let alone level or limited.
The original trigger was a conversation at a holiday party,
which I wished to amend here,
while John Dean and William James[***] were part of the head water or ledership.
[Speaking of flow, and roots or branches.]
[See Three Comments]
[Seg Way: E pit o'me[!]
/ I will now slightly edit a bit of above,
without adding any links as after thoughts unless noted.(see italics)]
[For the scroll-over challenged*, I will list the links in order...
(under construction I through XIX)
I Sciousness, wiki.
II Pandora, wiki.
III Theodicy, wiki.
IV Supply, blog search
V Demand, ibid.
VI slippery slope, ibid.
VII Power Broker, ibid.
VIII scroll, ibid.
IX ibid.,ibid[?]
X "Conservatives without Conscience"
XI "The Liberal Conscience"
XII Try-Unism
XIII google find "liberal conscience Dean"/Howard
XIV ibid. /Baker
XV "X & Y Chromo Somes", my blog
XVI "Image of Original In Tent", ibid.
XVII December 2011 archives, ibid.
XVIII "A PEAS Meant", ibid.
XIX "Post Script", ibid.
SEGUE:
Seg Elizabeth Warren replies to Karl Rove
Way Her way (video).
Epitome
[!] Sat Ire
A bit frayed at the edges.
*or to save you a trip
[See Comments up to the sixth, then I was Roving my web pages and found this. Speaking of Prophetic Tributes. Innocence bUy...to the good fight.]
[Speaking of frayed.**]
** see Seg Way source LA Times.
[***] 12-13-11 Correction to James(not Blake)
nor Out of the Box.
Speaking of Supply and Demand
or trickle down and bubble up.
No Dead C Scroll over, nor out.
Just a hint that things are not black and white,
nor up without down, let alone level or limited.
The original trigger was a conversation at a holiday party,
which I wished to amend here,
while John Dean and William James[***] were part of the head water or ledership.
[Speaking of flow, and roots or branches.]
[See Three Comments]
[Seg Way: E pit o'me[!]
/ I will now slightly edit a bit of above,
without adding any links as after thoughts unless noted.(see italics)]
[For the scroll-over challenged*, I will list the links in order...
(under construction I through XIX)
I Sciousness, wiki.
II Pandora, wiki.
III Theodicy, wiki.
IV Supply, blog search
V Demand, ibid.
VI slippery slope, ibid.
VII Power Broker, ibid.
VIII scroll, ibid.
IX ibid.,ibid[?]
X "Conservatives without Conscience"
XI "The Liberal Conscience"
XII Try-Unism
XIII google find "liberal conscience Dean"/Howard
XIV ibid. /Baker
XV "X & Y Chromo Somes", my blog
XVI "Image of Original In Tent", ibid.
XVII December 2011 archives, ibid.
XVIII "A PEAS Meant", ibid.
XIX "Post Script", ibid.
SEGUE:
Seg Elizabeth Warren replies to Karl Rove
Way Her way (video).
Epitome
[!] Sat Ire
A bit frayed at the edges.
*or to save you a trip
[See Comments up to the sixth, then I was Roving my web pages and found this. Speaking of Prophetic Tributes. Innocence bUy...to the good fight.]
[Speaking of frayed.**]
** see Seg Way source LA Times.
[***] 12-13-11 Correction to James(not Blake)
Wednesday, October 19, 2011
Almost makes me want to tweet.
The Tweet
The lede?
Well truthout.org headed an email as:
The Model is the Message.
Everything is on the table.
That is what Obama has frequently said, so get to the table.
By Jove!
[10-20-11: Actually there are some things that are off the table for everyone, but they are not always the same things or the same people. Like violence and social security as just examples. A crowd is not always able to control the violence of individuals let alone individual authorities. And taking social security off the table would mean that it doesn't get the help it needs. Everything getting on the table does not mean that it gets off the table, but people had better be with it.]
The lede?
Well truthout.org headed an email as:
The Model is the Message.
Everything is on the table.
That is what Obama has frequently said, so get to the table.
By Jove!
[10-20-11: Actually there are some things that are off the table for everyone, but they are not always the same things or the same people. Like violence and social security as just examples. A crowd is not always able to control the violence of individuals let alone individual authorities. And taking social security off the table would mean that it doesn't get the help it needs. Everything getting on the table does not mean that it gets off the table, but people had better be with it.]
Thursday, September 02, 2010
As the Inner Tubes
Move me...
speaking of spirit or editing/updating/searching*...
Nuf(f) said?** (link added and spell checked)
* I was going to use a brand name for "searching",but will try to use natural verbs or nouns, like tissue not Kl**nex.
[and in my "searching" for "discipline" I brought up a missing link in more than one way.
**(I really did not know where I had employed the term (nuff said) earlier, when I employed it here.]
[but if I may coin: Inner Tubes above.]
speaking of spirit or editing/updating/searching*...
Nuf(f) said?** (link added and spell checked)
* I was going to use a brand name for "searching",but will try to use natural verbs or nouns, like tissue not Kl**nex.
[and in my "searching" for "discipline" I brought up a missing link in more than one way.
**(I really did not know where I had employed the term (nuff said) earlier, when I employed it here.]
[but if I may coin: Inner Tubes above.]
Saturday, August 14, 2010
Failure of Modesty...
works on so many levels
except the Right[*].
[(cont.) 8-16-10 Needless explanation?
It is the modesty of the administration which has failed us, and the immodesty of the Republicans or Market Capitalists that brought collapse.]
[*True: "You don’t want government to try to restore confidence." Yet the problem was in the repeal of Glass-Steagall and the following three rules makes sense:
[Note: low debt is no more linked to low taxes than GDP is to values. The formulas for derivatives are the problem not the formulas for economics.]
except the Right[*].
[(cont.) 8-16-10 Needless explanation?
It is the modesty of the administration which has failed us, and the immodesty of the Republicans or Market Capitalists that brought collapse.]
[*True: "You don’t want government to try to restore confidence." Yet the problem was in the repeal of Glass-Steagall and the following three rules makes sense:
1. Low debtIt would seem that this argues for a less modest role for society as "venture capitalists." And the hazard is not planning to change enough.]
2. Eliminate derivatives, complex derivatives, keep the products that don’t require formulas...
3. Eliminate moral hazards...make sure they have no externalities
[Note: low debt is no more linked to low taxes than GDP is to values. The formulas for derivatives are the problem not the formulas for economics.]
Tuesday, August 10, 2010
Chart
Bank for the Buck
The Economy is not just Economics, and neither so economic.
Pun aside, it is real.
No irony intended, that too is germane.
[This was not an intended ribble, but if only I had flip-floppin fonts.]
[...sorry I was lost in google, and could not find my Post-Nietzschean-Manicheanism, but I will now coin* Post-Nietzschean-Manichean-Platonics or Ironic Nature of Balance.]
* embedded link
[8-12-10 Obama. Ribble, is accidental label, but maybe my Nietzsche. Value Vectoring? (vv)W Not!]
The Economy is not just Economics, and neither so economic.
Pun aside, it is real.
No irony intended, that too is germane.
[This was not an intended ribble, but if only I had flip-floppin fonts.]
[...sorry I was lost in google, and could not find my Post-Nietzschean-Manicheanism, but I will now coin* Post-Nietzschean-Manichean-Platonics or Ironic Nature of Balance.]
* embedded link
[8-12-10 Obama. Ribble, is accidental label, but maybe my Nietzsche. Value Vectoring? (vv)W Not!]
Thursday, May 27, 2010
Failure is always
an ingredient of progress. Perfection is always a failure. (Overwhelming superiority and the best and brightest of intentions* aside.)
* parsing and puns or Pen Dull'em [**]aside there are important dynamics involved
[**] 5-29-10 Err at'm to my original swing
* parsing and puns or Pen Dull'em [**]aside there are important dynamics involved
[**] 5-29-10 Err at'm to my original swing
Thursday, May 20, 2010
Tuesday, March 16, 2010
What the Beck?
[Under-De(con)struction.]
OK, this actually works in the perspective of the way some use words.
As in De for Dem and destruction, and Con for conservative and construction. Heck even conservation. Oops. I think we get the flip-flop. Lack of perspective is the subject, and preemption the aim of their construction. This is a work in progress. I'm still chalking it up.
My friend Thrasymachus* is embedded in the above (con) link...
while our seemingly seemly nemesis might be lost in Flatland.
I have recently revamped my PBMP tetrahedron, to the Tetrahedron of Will or TOW. It all began with my reading of Plato's Republic, going on 40 years ago, and my presentation not in a Platonic solid form but in a Platonic pillar model. Justice being the point, with appetites, emotions, and intellect being the base. I cannot vouch for these as being my original tripod to the triangular pillar, but I more recently reconstructed this balanced purpose on the legs of Physics, Psychology and Philosophy coming together to evolve Justice, much as our constitution rests or rather works with the balance of three branches and rests or works on the people.
Words are sometimes only ideals, but in reality I must say they are always ideals, but in some they are missing the concept of perspective, if not even a dimension(or pun, just dimentioning it), and whether you seem left or right or middle the reality is not even in line or online with a spectrum. The Third Way might not even be enough of a perspective, but it is better than Linear Beck or my way or the highway. [It was purported to be the Clinton way in that the aim was a balance between the goals of the left and right of the political spectrum(Ideally to move the middle nontheless) but I might say that the Obama way is more balanced, and may point to answers that are not always just a balance between two extremes or even two parties, and many people understand that, even though we feel that our way might be better it is hard to let go of our ideals.
[I believe I have now finished construction of this post, but have yet to finish reading the first link, and my "What the Beck" referred to my own preemption or condescending reference in the previous post.]
* Thrasymachus: a character in The Republic, and nickname for a Neo-Con I know, who might more accurately be called a Beck Head, or Eon-Libertarian (which I just pegged). [I won't peg any meaning on the Eon part, only to say I(not quite) flipped Neo.]
[Disclaimer: My first use of the term phrase "What the Beck?" was just yesterday, and until I just googled it, I had no knowledge it was a YouTube Channel, and I only used it as a segue to MoveOn to other issues. A search also found the Daily Beast and Op-Ed references and I might have picked on the Countdown but not the Intelligent Design, but the Gee Oh Me Try is similar but I can't dig up that one.]
[UPDATE 3-17-10: The "seemingly" link does not quite buffer completely, and has moderate moments but lacks perspective and balance let alone appreciation of others or perspective**. It can certainly be understood why everything seems off balance, but it is another to have an intention to balance it or respect dynamics, human or natural.]
** pulled from second link in the context of Thrasymachus
OK, this actually works in the perspective of the way some use words.
As in De for Dem and destruction, and Con for conservative and construction. Heck even conservation. Oops. I think we get the flip-flop. Lack of perspective is the subject, and preemption the aim of their construction. This is a work in progress. I'm still chalking it up.
My friend Thrasymachus* is embedded in the above (con) link...
while our seemingly seemly nemesis might be lost in Flatland.
I have recently revamped my PBMP tetrahedron, to the Tetrahedron of Will or TOW. It all began with my reading of Plato's Republic, going on 40 years ago, and my presentation not in a Platonic solid form but in a Platonic pillar model. Justice being the point, with appetites, emotions, and intellect being the base. I cannot vouch for these as being my original tripod to the triangular pillar, but I more recently reconstructed this balanced purpose on the legs of Physics, Psychology and Philosophy coming together to evolve Justice, much as our constitution rests or rather works with the balance of three branches and rests or works on the people.
Words are sometimes only ideals, but in reality I must say they are always ideals, but in some they are missing the concept of perspective, if not even a dimension(or pun, just dimentioning it), and whether you seem left or right or middle the reality is not even in line or online with a spectrum. The Third Way might not even be enough of a perspective, but it is better than Linear Beck or my way or the highway. [It was purported to be the Clinton way in that the aim was a balance between the goals of the left and right of the political spectrum(Ideally to move the middle nontheless) but I might say that the Obama way is more balanced, and may point to answers that are not always just a balance between two extremes or even two parties, and many people understand that, even though we feel that our way might be better it is hard to let go of our ideals.
[I believe I have now finished construction of this post, but have yet to finish reading the first link, and my "What the Beck" referred to my own preemption or condescending reference in the previous post.]
* Thrasymachus: a character in The Republic, and nickname for a Neo-Con I know, who might more accurately be called a Beck Head, or Eon-Libertarian (which I just pegged). [I won't peg any meaning on the Eon part, only to say I(not quite) flipped Neo.]
[Disclaimer: My first use of the term phrase "What the Beck?" was just yesterday, and until I just googled it, I had no knowledge it was a YouTube Channel, and I only used it as a segue to MoveOn to other issues. A search also found the Daily Beast and Op-Ed references and I might have picked on the Countdown but not the Intelligent Design, but the Gee Oh Me Try is similar but I can't dig up that one.]
[UPDATE 3-17-10: The "seemingly" link does not quite buffer completely, and has moderate moments but lacks perspective and balance let alone appreciation of others or perspective**. It can certainly be understood why everything seems off balance, but it is another to have an intention to balance it or respect dynamics, human or natural.]
** pulled from second link in the context of Thrasymachus
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)